How Old Am I? – An Introspective on Society in Our Lifetimes

By |2019-12-24T02:55:21+00:00December 24th, 2019|Crime and Prevention, Culture Wars, Economics, History|

One evening a grandson was talking to his grandfather about current events.  He asked his grandfather what he thought about the shootings at schools, the computer age, and just things in general.

The Grandfather replied, “Well, let me think a minute, I was born before:

Television, penicillin, polio shots, frozen foods, Xerox, contact lenses, frisbees, and the pill.

There were NO credit cards, laser beams, or, ball-point pens.

Man had not invented pantyhose, air conditioners, dishwashers, clothes dryers, microwave ovens, cell phones, or fax machines.

The clothes were hung out to dry in the fresh air, and space travel was only in Flash Gordon books.

Your Grandmother and I got married first,… and then lived together. Every family had a father and a mother.

Until I was 25, I called every woman older than me, “ma’am”. And after I turned 25, I still called policemen and every
man with a title, “Sir”.

We were before gay-rights, computer-dating, dual careers, daycare centers,
and group therapy.

Our lives were governed by the Bible, good judgment, and common sense. We were taught to know the difference between right and wrong, and to stand up and take responsibility for our actions.

Serving your country was a privilege; living in this country was a bigger privilege…

We thought fast food was eating half a biscuit while running to
catch the school bus.

Having a meaningful relationship meant getting along with your cousins.

Draft dodgers were those who closed front doors as the evening breeze
started.

Time-sharing meant time the family spent together in the evenings and weekends – not purchasing condominiums.

We never heard of FM radios, tape decks, CDs, electric typewriters, yogurt, or guys wearing earrings.

We listened to Big Bands, Jack Benny, and the President’s speeches on our radios. And I don’t ever remember any kid blowing his brains out listening to Tommy Dorsey.

If you saw anything with ‘Made in Japan’ on it, it was junk.

The term ‘making out’ referred to how you did on your school exam….

Pizza Hut, McDonald’s, and instant coffee were unheard of.

We had 5 & 10-cent stores where you could actually buy things for 5 and 10 cents. Or there was penny candy that actually cost a penny. Ice-cream cones, phone calls, rides on a streetcar, and a Pepsi were all a nickel. And if you didn’t want to splurge, you could spend your nickel on enough stamps to mail 1 letter and 2 postcards.

You could buy a new Ford Coupe for $600, …. but who could afford one? Too bad, because gas was 11 cents a gallon.

In my day:

  • “grass” was mowed,
  • “coke” was a cold drink
  • “pot” was something your mother cooked in
  • “rock music” was your grandmother’s lullaby
  • “Aids” were helpers in the Principal’s office
  • “chip” meant a piece of wood
  • “hardware” was found in a hardware store and “software” wasn’t even a word.

And we were the last generation to actually believe that a lady needed a husband to have a baby.

How old do you think I am?

I bet you have a very old man in mind…well, you are in for a shock!

Read on to see — pretty scary if you think about it and pretty sad at the
same time. Are you ready?????

This man would be 72 years old today.
72 years ago was 1947.

THINK ABOUT HOW FAR OFF CENTER WE HAVE BECOME – MORALLY AT LEAST.

White House: On ICE, Democrats abandon the mainstream

By |2018-08-22T21:21:08+00:00August 22nd, 2018|Crime and Prevention, Immigration Citizenship|

Despite public opposition, numerous Democrats continue to call for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to be abolished. It’s a belief that falls squarely outside the American mainstream: According to a recent POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, only 25 percent of voters support getting rid of ICE.

A majority of Americans know we must keep ICE, and for good reason: Eliminating this crucial piece of our national security force would grind immigration enforcement to a halt, with devastating consequences for public safety. Abolishing ICE would mean abolishing the agency responsible for removing drug dealers, gang members, and other criminals who exploit America’s border to take advantage of our communities.

The numbers don’t lie. Criminals arrested by ICE during the 2017 fiscal year were responsible for:

• More than 76,000 dangerous drug offenses;

• More than 48,000 assault offenses;

• More than 11,000 weapon offenses;

• More than 5,000 sexual assault offenses;

• More than 2,000 kidnapping offenses; and

• More than 1,800 homicide offenses.

Our immigration law enforcement officers work in dangerous conditions to protect our communities. We must stand with them. Recently, 167 Democrats in the House of Representatives refused to vote for a resolution to support these border officials. “To the courageous public servants at ICE, men and women, we want you to know that the American people are with you and my administration has your back 100 percent,” President Trump said in his most recent weekly address.

Reality Check (Video/Download)

By |2018-07-31T02:11:08+00:00July 31st, 2018|Crime and Prevention|

This young lady filmed this on September 11, 2017. However, when you listen to her, just think back to that 16th anniversary of 9/11 …Don’t miss this one! Worth your time! This was filmed right after 9/11/17 and presents a reality check: how have Americans changed in 16 years. This young lady rightly calls out today’s idiots in a short 2 minute video. I don’t blame her a bit.  Remember September 11th 2001 & God bless America …

Folks, please give this the widest distribution; all need to REMEMBER….

 

New Obama Gun Rules Could Hurt Doctor-Patient Confidentiality

By |2016-11-11T00:14:11+00:00January 6th, 2016|Crime and Prevention, Gun Control|

President Obama’s Tuesday announcement that he would be tightening rules for gun purchases was expected to incite controversy, but the biggest problem with them may not be his targeting of the much hyped “gun show loophole” but yet another foray by the administration into America’s healthcare system, reports Politico:

While the 1993 Brady law prohibits gun ownership by individuals who have been involuntarily committed, found incompetent to stand trial or otherwise deemed by a court to be a danger to themselves or others, federal health care privacy rules prohibited doctors and other providers from sharing information without the consent of their patients.

Under the rule, which takes effect next month, for the first time health providers can disclose the information to the background check system without legal repercussions.

Needless to say, the idea that our doctor should be able to single handedly decide whether or not we are entitled to our 2nd Amendment rights should give anyone pause.  Further, as a result of yesterday’s new rules it seems likely that a lot of people who need mental help will opt not to seek it, driven by a fear that their doctor will report them.  Ultimately, this well-meaning attempt to curve gun violence could just have the opposite effect.

No Moral Backbone – Block of Kate’s Law Legislation

By |2015-10-22T05:09:30+00:00October 22nd, 2015|Crime and Prevention, Sanctuary Cities|

Contributor: Frank Charger
Absolutely disgusting “Kate’s law” legislation didn’t pass because it was bundled with a Sanctuary City funding bill which of course the democrats defeated in the Senate.  Only 2 democrats voted for it.
It should have been a stand alone vote.  Mitch McConnell should be castrated. Harry Reid had comments on Trump and O’Reilly that were criminal. If there is no provision for mandatory sentencing of someone like Lopez Sanchez who came back into the country as a felon six times, broke into a car,  stole a gun,  and shot Kate Steinle to death all because he is a dumba**.
The NYT defends him and so do the democrats — and even the republicans have some blame for not pushing this and making this the issue it should be.  Educate the masses and stand up for what’s right republicans.

 

Reducing the Harm and Risk of Violent Victimization: How to Help a Coworker

By |2016-11-11T00:14:20+00:00September 15th, 2015|Crime and Prevention|

JAMES F. KENNY

School of Criminal Justice & Legal Studies, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey, USA. The purpose of this article is to present a model that discusses how coworkers can safely intervene to support survivors of violence and reduce their risk of further victimization. There are many employees who are traumatized by the devastating physical, emotional, psychological, financial, and quality of life consequences of violent crime victimization, yet remain vulnerable for future attacks.

They may be unwilling to contact criminal justice and corporate officials but may feel more comfortable discussing these matters with friends at work. These coworkers may be more willing to help if they know what they can and should do. The H-E-L-P-A-C-OW-O-R-K-E-R model provides specific suggestions on how to listen, express concern, and connect survivors to caregivers. It proposes ways they can help survivors minimize the risk of repeat victimization by encouraging and assisting them in developing safety plans, contacting security professionals, reducing vulnerabilities, and identifying dangerous warning signs.

INTRODUCTION

There are too many employees who are traumatized by the consequences of violent crime victimizations, yet remain vulnerable for future attacks. The National Crime Victim Surveys (2009) estimate that there were nearly 600,000 nonfatal violent crimes against employees while they were at work, and more than three times that total who experienced violence outside the workplace  – Read more>> Kenny_ReducingHarm

Go to Top